Re-tested November 2026 · rated by June Park · 0 paid placements
The best discovery data per dollar — 250M+ creator profiles with real audience quality metrics.
Finding creators whose audience is actually real and actually yours.
Lean teams doing their own outreach.
from ~$99/mo
Discovery and outreach — payments and rights management are light.
Modash's overall 8.4/10 in Influencer marketing breaks down across the four Stackranked criteria as follows. Grades are the reviewer's qualitative assessment per criterion; the overall score is the weighted editorial rating.
| Criterion | Weight | Modash | Evidence from testing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hands-on testing on real campaigns | 40% | fair | Finding creators whose audience is actually real and actually yours. |
| Real pricing at real usage volumes | 25% | fair | Priced at from ~$99/mo (approximate, November 2026). No free tier changes the evaluation math — the trial period has to prove it. |
| Output quality vs. the category leader | 20% | strong | The best discovery data per dollar — 250M+ creator profiles with real audience quality metrics. |
| Support, docs and speed of fixes | 15% | fair | Scored from real tickets, docs and response times during the Influencer marketing re-test. |
Modash ranks #3 of the 5 tools we recommend in Influencer marketing (November 2026 re-test). The full field:
| Rank | Tool | Score | Pricing (approx) |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | GRIN | 8.7/10 | custom, annual — budget ~$25k+/yr |
| #2 | CreatorIQ | 8.6/10 | custom, enterprise |
| #3 | Modash | 8.4/10 | from ~$99/mo |
| #4 | Aspire | 8.3/10 | custom |
| #5 | Upfluence | 8.0/10 | custom, sales-led |
Modash holds #3 at 8.4/10 while GRIN sits #1 at 8.7/10 in our Influencer marketing testing. The case for GRIN: End-to-end creator management for ecommerce — recruiting, gifting, content rights, payments and revenue tracking in one place. Its honest limit: Priced for committed programs; annual contracts, no dabbling tier.
Modash holds #3 at 8.4/10 while CreatorIQ sits #2 at 8.6/10 in our Influencer marketing testing. The case for CreatorIQ: The enterprise standard — governance, measurement and global program management for big brand creator ops. Its honest limit: Enterprise-only in price and process.
Modash holds #3 at 8.4/10 while Aspire sits #4 at 8.3/10 in our Influencer marketing testing. The case for Aspire: Creator community platform blending influencer, affiliate and UGC motions for commerce brands. Its honest limit: Jack of several trades — deepest at none of them.
Modash holds #3 at 8.4/10 while Upfluence sits #5 at 8.0/10 in our Influencer marketing testing. The case for Upfluence: All-in-one discovery-to-payment with solid data and ecommerce hooks. Its honest limit: Dated UI and a sales-led buying process.
Modash is built for lean teams doing their own outreach. Its core strength: finding creators whose audience is actually real and actually yours. In practice that means deep filterable creator search, fake-follower and audience analysis, and email finding and outreach — the capabilities that earned its 8.4/10.
Modash's honest limit, printed in every review we publish: Discovery and outreach — payments and rights management are light. If that describes you, start with GRIN or CreatorIQ — the full field is in our Influencer marketing ranking.
Modash costs approximately from ~$99/mo as of our November 2026 re-verification — pricing changes, so confirm on the vendor's site. Across the Influencer marketing top five, 0 of 5 tools offer a free tier or free product, and 4 of 5 hide pricing behind custom or enterprise quotes (GRIN, CreatorIQ, Aspire, Upfluence).
| Tool | Pricing (approximate, November 2026) |
|---|---|
| GRIN | custom, annual — budget ~$25k+/yr |
| CreatorIQ | custom, enterprise |
| Modash | from ~$99/mo |
| Aspire | custom |
| Upfluence | custom, sales-led |
Every tool in our Influencer marketing ranking ran the same category brief on live accounts, scored by June Park (social & creator lead) under the Stackranked methodology: hands-on testing on real campaigns (40%), real pricing at real usage volumes (25%), output quality against the category leader (20%), and support, docs and speed of fixes (15%). Scores were last re-tested in November 2026; every movement is logged in the changelog. Positions cannot be bought — 0 paid placements.
| Criterion | Weight |
|---|---|
| Hands-on testing on real campaigns | 40% |
| Real pricing at real usage volumes | 25% |
| Output quality vs. the category leader | 20% |
| Support, docs and speed of fixes | 15% |
Category context: Influencer marketing platforms handle creator discovery, vetting, outreach, relationship management, content rights, payments and measurement. The category runs from discovery databases with audience-quality analysis to full creator-CRM suites that manage hundreds of ongoing relationships.
Modash scores 8.4/10 in Stackranked's Influencer marketing testing (November 2026) — worth it for lean teams doing their own outreach. The honest limit: Discovery and outreach — payments and rights management are light.
Approximately from ~$99/mo (November 2026). Pricing changes — verify on the vendor's site.
Lean teams doing their own outreach. Core strength: finding creators whose audience is actually real and actually yours.
No. Modash had no free tier at our November 2026 re-test; pricing starts at approximately from ~$99/mo.
In our Influencer marketing testing, Modash scores 8.4/10 vs GRIN's 8.7/10. Modash wins for lean teams doing their own outreach; GRIN wins when this fits: DTC brands scaling creator programs.
Discovery and outreach — payments and rights management are light.
November 2026, by June Park under the Stackranked methodology. Scores are re-tested quarterly and every movement is logged in the public changelog.