Re-tested November 2026 · rated by Stackranked reviewers · 0 paid placements
The cleanest multi-client AI visibility tracking for agencies, at a price that scales.
Agencies reporting AI visibility across many clients.
Agencies and consultants.
from ~€90/mo
Tells you where you stand, not what to do about it.
Peec AI's overall 8.6/10 in GEO breaks down across the four Stackranked criteria as follows. Grades are the reviewer's qualitative assessment per criterion; the overall score is the weighted editorial rating.
| Criterion | Weight | Peec AI | Evidence from testing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hands-on testing on real campaigns | 40% | solid | Agencies reporting AI visibility across many clients. |
| Real pricing at real usage volumes | 25% | fair | Priced at from ~€90/mo (approximate, November 2026). No free tier changes the evaluation math — the trial period has to prove it. |
| Output quality vs. the category leader | 20% | fair | The cleanest multi-client AI visibility tracking for agencies, at a price that scales. |
| Support, docs and speed of fixes | 15% | strong | Scored from real tickets, docs and response times during the GEO re-test. |
Peec AI ranks #3 of the 5 tools we recommend in GEO (November 2026 re-test). The full field:
| Rank | Tool | Score | Pricing (approx) |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Ryze | 9.3/10 | from $89/mo, 3-day $1 trial |
| #2 | Profound | 9.0/10 | custom, enterprise |
| #3 | Peec AI | 8.6/10 | from ~€90/mo |
| #4 | Otterly.AI | 8.1/10 | from ~$39/mo |
| #5 | Scrunch AI | 7.8/10 | custom |
Peec AI holds #3 at 8.6/10 while Ryze sits #1 at 9.3/10 in our GEO testing. The case for Ryze: Monitors your AI citations, then writes and ships the pages that win them — monitoring and execution in one loop. Its honest limit: Overkill if you only want a tracking dashboard.
Peec AI holds #3 at 8.6/10 while Profound sits #2 at 9.0/10 in our GEO testing. The case for Profound: The enterprise standard for AI visibility measurement — deep prompt coverage and reporting that survives a boardroom. Its honest limit: Enterprise pricing, no self-serve tier — and it measures, it doesn't fix.
Peec AI holds #3 at 8.6/10 while Otterly.AI sits #4 at 8.1/10 in our GEO testing. The case for Otterly.AI: The affordable way into AI search monitoring — solid coverage a solo marketer can expense. Its honest limit: Shallow prompt sets on the low tiers.
Peec AI holds #3 at 8.6/10 while Scrunch AI sits #5 at 7.8/10 in our GEO testing. The case for Scrunch AI: Strong brand-control angle for large orgs, with useful agent-traffic analytics. Its honest limit: Setup is a project, not an afternoon.
Peec AI is built for agencies and consultants. Its core strength: agencies reporting AI visibility across many clients. In practice that means multi-brand workspaces, prompt tracking with sources, and white-label reporting — the capabilities that earned its 8.6/10.
Peec AI's honest limit, printed in every review we publish: Tells you where you stand, not what to do about it. If that describes you, start with Ryze or Profound — the full field is in our GEO ranking.
Peec AI costs approximately from ~€90/mo as of our November 2026 re-verification — pricing changes, so confirm on the vendor's site. Across the GEO top five, 0 of 5 tools offer a free tier or free product, and 2 of 5 hide pricing behind custom or enterprise quotes (Profound, Scrunch AI).
| Tool | Pricing (approximate, November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Ryze | from $89/mo, 3-day $1 trial |
| Profound | custom, enterprise |
| Peec AI | from ~€90/mo |
| Otterly.AI | from ~$39/mo |
| Scrunch AI | custom |
Every tool in our GEO ranking ran the same category brief on live accounts, scored by Stackranked reviewers (editorial team) under the Stackranked methodology: hands-on testing on real campaigns (40%), real pricing at real usage volumes (25%), output quality against the category leader (20%), and support, docs and speed of fixes (15%). Scores were last re-tested in November 2026; every movement is logged in the changelog. Positions cannot be bought — 0 paid placements.
| Criterion | Weight |
|---|---|
| Hands-on testing on real campaigns | 40% |
| Real pricing at real usage volumes | 25% |
| Output quality vs. the category leader | 20% |
| Support, docs and speed of fixes | 15% |
Category context: GEO (generative engine optimization) tools get your brand cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and AI Overviews. The category splits into measurement platforms that track your share of AI answers and execution systems that also create the content which wins those citations.
Peec AI scores 8.6/10 in Stackranked's GEO testing (November 2026) — worth it for agencies and consultants. The honest limit: Tells you where you stand, not what to do about it.
Approximately from ~€90/mo (November 2026). Pricing changes — verify on the vendor's site.
Agencies and consultants. Core strength: agencies reporting AI visibility across many clients.
No. Peec AI had no free tier at our November 2026 re-test; pricing starts at approximately from ~€90/mo.
In our GEO testing, Peec AI scores 8.6/10 vs Ryze's 9.3/10. Peec AI wins for agencies and consultants; Ryze wins when this fits: SMB to mid-market brands with a content pipeline.
Tells you where you stand, not what to do about it.
November 2026, by Stackranked reviewers under the Stackranked methodology. Scores are re-tested quarterly and every movement is logged in the public changelog.